U.P.S. JAAM ROOM NO.2 PS 323
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP179 votes at this polling station
over DASHARATH LAL (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 179 | 42.02% | |
| 2 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 125 | 29.34% | |
| 3 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 103 | 24.18% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 9 | 2.11% | |
| 5 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 4 | 0.94% | |
| 6 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 7 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 8 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 9 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 10 | SURENDRA | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 11 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 426 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 179 | 41.63% | 1 | 231 | Strong |
| BSP | 125 | 29.07% | 2 | 34 | Average |
| SP | 103 | 23.95% | 3 | 330 | Weak |
| INC | 9 | 2.09% | 4 | 158 | Poor |
| IND | 6 | 1.40% | 5 | 315 | Poor |
| CPI | 2 | 0.47% | 6 | 350 | Poor |
| SBU | 1 | 0.23% | 7 | 222 | Poor |
| VSIP | 1 | 0.23% | 8 | 209 | Poor |
| SS | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 387 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 362 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.