P.S. BHADAUHA ROOM NO-1 PS 303
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP153 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 153 | 35.92% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 128 | 30.05% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 117 | 27.46% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 6 | 1.41% | |
| 5 | SURENDRA | IND | 6 | 1.41% | |
| 6 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 4 | 0.94% | |
| 7 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 3 | 0.70% | |
| 8 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 9 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 10 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 11 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 12 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 13 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 426 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 153 | 35.83% | 1 | 270 | Average |
| SP | 128 | 29.98% | 2 | 280 | Average |
| BSP | 117 | 27.40% | 3 | 44 | Average |
| IND | 16 | 3.75% | 4 | 92 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 1.41% | 5 | 257 | Poor |
| CPI | 3 | 0.70% | 6 | 295 | Poor |
| VSIP | 2 | 0.47% | 7 | 96 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.23% | 8 | 198 | Poor |
| SBU | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 375 | Poor |
| SS | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 383 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.