U.P.S.KHASMAU ROOM NO-1 PS 3
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP334 votes at this polling station
over DASHARATH LAL (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 334 | 55.57% | |
| 2 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 176 | 29.28% | |
| 3 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 54 | 8.99% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 14 | 2.33% | |
| 5 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 8 | 1.33% | |
| 6 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 4 | 0.67% | |
| 7 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 8 | SURENDRA | IND | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 9 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 10 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 13 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 14 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 601 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 334 | 55.12% | 1 | 49 | Strong |
| BSP | 176 | 29.04% | 2 | 8 | Average |
| SP | 54 | 8.91% | 3 | 390 | Poor |
| IND | 15 | 2.48% | 4 | 99 | Poor |
| INC | 14 | 2.31% | 5 | 62 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.66% | 6 | 221 | Poor |
| SBU | 2 | 0.33% | 7 | 74 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.17% | 8 | 212 | Poor |
| VSIP | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 109 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 230 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.