P.S. SHIVPURI ROOM NO-1 PS 292
RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS
SPSP220 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNA PASWAN (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 220 | 45.74% | |
| 2 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 167 | 34.72% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 43 | 8.94% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 41 | 8.52% | |
| 5 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 3 | 0.62% | |
| 6 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 7 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 8 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 9 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 10 | SURENDRA | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 11 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 481 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 220 | 45.36% | 1 | 144 | Strong |
| BJP | 167 | 34.43% | 2 | 249 | Average |
| BSP | 43 | 8.87% | 3 | 206 | Poor |
| INC | 41 | 8.45% | 4 | 4 | Poor |
| IND | 6 | 1.24% | 5 | 312 | Poor |
| CPI | 2 | 0.41% | 7 | 340 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.41% | 6 | 99 | Poor |
| SBU | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 370 | Poor |
| SS | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 380 | Poor |
| VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 350 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.