P.S. KACHHARA RYOOM NO-2 PS 288
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP286 votes at this polling station
over NILAM SONI (VSIP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 286 | 75.46% | |
| 2 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 45 | 11.87% | |
| 3 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 13 | 3.43% | |
| 4 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 10 | 2.64% | |
| 5 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 10 | 2.64% | |
| 6 | SURENDRA | IND | 5 | 1.32% | |
| 7 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 4 | 1.06% | |
| 8 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 2 | 0.53% | |
| 9 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.53% | |
| 10 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 11 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 12 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 379 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 286 | 74.48% | 1 | 89 | Strong |
| VSIP | 45 | 11.72% | 2 | 5 | Weak |
| IND | 21 | 5.47% | 3 | 46 | Poor |
| SP | 10 | 2.60% | 5 | 409 | Poor |
| BSP | 10 | 2.60% | 4 | 353 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 1.04% | 6 | 254 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.52% | 7 | 385 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.26% | 8 | 291 | Poor |
| SBU | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 367 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 348 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.