P.S. TIKURA GADHA ROOM NO-2 PS 282
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP216 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 216 | 55.53% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 60 | 15.42% | |
| 3 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 52 | 13.37% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 12 | 3.08% | |
| 5 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 9 | 2.31% | |
| 6 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 9 | 2.31% | |
| 7 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 8 | 2.06% | |
| 8 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 7 | 1.80% | |
| 9 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 4 | 1.03% | |
| 10 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 3 | 0.77% | |
| 11 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 3 | 0.77% | |
| 12 | SURENDRA | IND | 3 | 0.77% | |
| 13 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.77% | |
| 14 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 389 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 216 | 54.14% | 1 | 173 | Strong |
| SP | 60 | 15.04% | 2 | 383 | Weak |
| VSIP | 52 | 13.03% | 3 | 4 | Weak |
| IND | 18 | 4.51% | 4 | 72 | Poor |
| INC | 12 | 3.01% | 5 | 97 | Poor |
| CPI | 9 | 2.26% | 6 | 68 | Poor |
| SS | 8 | 2.01% | 7 | 6 | Poor |
| BSP | 7 | 1.75% | 8 | 371 | Poor |
| SBU | 4 | 1.00% | 9 | 48 | Poor |
| BSCP | 3 | 0.75% | 10 | 47 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.