P.S. TIKURA GADHA ROOM NO-1 PS 281
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP272 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 272 | 56.55% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 108 | 22.45% | |
| 3 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 29 | 6.03% | |
| 4 | SURENDRA | IND | 11 | 2.29% | |
| 5 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 10 | 2.08% | |
| 6 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 10 | 2.08% | |
| 7 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 10 | 2.08% | |
| 8 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 8 | 1.66% | |
| 9 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 6 | 1.25% | |
| 10 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 4 | 0.83% | |
| 11 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 4 | 0.83% | |
| 12 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 4 | 0.83% | |
| 13 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 3 | 0.62% | |
| 14 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.42% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 481 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 272 | 56.08% | 1 | 106 | Strong |
| SP | 108 | 22.27% | 2 | 318 | Weak |
| IND | 32 | 6.60% | 3 | 9 | Poor |
| VSIP | 29 | 5.98% | 4 | 8 | Poor |
| CPI | 10 | 2.06% | 5 | 48 | Poor |
| INC | 10 | 2.06% | 6 | 130 | Poor |
| BSP | 8 | 1.65% | 7 | 367 | Poor |
| BSCP | 4 | 0.82% | 8 | 24 | Poor |
| SBU | 4 | 0.82% | 9 | 47 | Poor |
| SS | 4 | 0.82% | 10 | 67 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.