P.S. SANGOLIPUR GADHA ROOM NO-2 PS 280
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP317 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 317 | 53.37% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 119 | 20.03% | |
| 3 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 62 | 10.44% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 27 | 4.55% | |
| 5 | SURENDRA | IND | 19 | 3.20% | |
| 6 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 10 | 1.68% | |
| 7 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 10 | 1.68% | |
| 8 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 8 | 1.35% | |
| 9 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 6 | 1.01% | |
| 10 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 6 | 1.01% | |
| 11 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 5 | 0.84% | |
| 12 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 13 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 14 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 1 | 0.17% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 594 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 317 | 52.48% | 1 | 63 | Strong |
| SP | 119 | 19.70% | 2 | 296 | Weak |
| VSIP | 62 | 10.26% | 3 | 3 | Weak |
| IND | 39 | 6.46% | 4 | 2 | Poor |
| INC | 27 | 4.47% | 5 | 16 | Poor |
| BSP | 10 | 1.66% | 6 | 352 | Poor |
| CPI | 10 | 1.66% | 7 | 47 | Poor |
| SBU | 6 | 0.99% | 8 | 25 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.33% | 10 | 190 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.33% | 9 | 98 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.