P.S. NARAULI GADHA ROOM NO-2 PS 278
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP260 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 260 | 59.09% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 104 | 23.64% | |
| 3 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 26 | 5.91% | |
| 4 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 12 | 2.73% | |
| 5 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 11 | 2.50% | |
| 6 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 6 | 1.36% | |
| 7 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 5 | 1.14% | |
| 8 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 4 | 0.91% | |
| 9 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 4 | 0.91% | |
| 10 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 4 | 0.91% | |
| 11 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 2 | 0.45% | |
| 12 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 13 | SURENDRA | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 14 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 440 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 260 | 58.56% | 1 | 117 | Strong |
| SP | 104 | 23.42% | 2 | 327 | Weak |
| VSIP | 26 | 5.86% | 3 | 9 | Poor |
| BSP | 12 | 2.70% | 4 | 338 | Poor |
| INC | 11 | 2.48% | 5 | 114 | Poor |
| IND | 11 | 2.48% | 6 | 197 | Poor |
| SS | 6 | 1.35% | 7 | 20 | Poor |
| SBU | 4 | 0.90% | 9 | 46 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.90% | 8 | 252 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.45% | 10 | 97 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.