P.S. GADHA KHAAS ROOM NO-2 PS 276
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP164 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 164 | 50.15% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 112 | 34.25% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 25 | 7.65% | |
| 4 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 6 | 1.83% | |
| 5 | SURENDRA | IND | 4 | 1.22% | |
| 6 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 4 | 1.22% | |
| 7 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 3 | 0.92% | |
| 8 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 2 | 0.61% | |
| 9 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 2 | 0.61% | |
| 10 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 2 | 0.61% | |
| 11 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 12 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 13 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 14 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 327 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 164 | 48.96% | 1 | 253 | Strong |
| SP | 112 | 33.43% | 2 | 308 | Average |
| BSP | 25 | 7.46% | 3 | 274 | Poor |
| IND | 14 | 4.18% | 4 | 129 | Poor |
| VSIP | 4 | 1.19% | 5 | 30 | Poor |
| BSCP | 3 | 0.90% | 6 | 46 | Poor |
| CPI | 2 | 0.60% | 7 | 337 | Poor |
| SBU | 2 | 0.60% | 8 | 112 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.30% | 9 | 400 | Poor |
| SS | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 375 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.