P.S. AHAMADGANJ TIHAR ROOM NO-2 PS 269
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP224 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 224 | 58.03% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 97 | 25.13% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 26 | 6.74% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 10 | 2.59% | |
| 5 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 7 | 1.81% | |
| 6 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 5 | 1.30% | |
| 7 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 4 | 1.04% | |
| 8 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 3 | 0.78% | |
| 9 | SURENDRA | IND | 3 | 0.78% | |
| 10 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 2 | 0.52% | |
| 11 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.52% | |
| 12 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 2 | 0.52% | |
| 13 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 14 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 386 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 224 | 57.73% | 1 | 163 | Strong |
| SP | 97 | 25.00% | 2 | 337 | Average |
| BSP | 26 | 6.70% | 3 | 267 | Poor |
| IND | 13 | 3.35% | 4 | 149 | Poor |
| INC | 10 | 2.58% | 5 | 129 | Poor |
| CPI | 7 | 1.80% | 6 | 122 | Poor |
| VSIP | 4 | 1.03% | 7 | 29 | Poor |
| SS | 3 | 0.77% | 8 | 111 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.52% | 9 | 95 | Poor |
| SBU | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 362 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.