P.S. SALWAN ROOM NO-2 PS 262
RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS
SPSP109 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNA PASWAN (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 109 | 43.95% | |
| 2 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 67 | 27.02% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 60 | 24.19% | |
| 4 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 4 | 1.61% | |
| 5 | SURENDRA | IND | 3 | 1.21% | |
| 6 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 2 | 0.81% | |
| 7 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 1 | 0.40% | |
| 8 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 1 | 0.40% | |
| 9 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 1 | 0.40% | |
| 10 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 248 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 109 | 43.25% | 1 | 315 | Strong |
| BJP | 67 | 26.59% | 2 | 372 | Average |
| BSP | 60 | 23.81% | 3 | 144 | Weak |
| IND | 7 | 2.78% | 4 | 286 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.79% | 5 | 188 | Poor |
| SBU | 1 | 0.40% | 8 | 203 | Poor |
| CPI | 1 | 0.40% | 6 | 384 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.40% | 7 | 399 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 338 | Poor |
| VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 343 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.