P.S. SALWAN ROOM NO-1 PS 261
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP417 votes at this polling station
over DASHARATH LAL (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 417 | 60.09% | |
| 2 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 163 | 23.49% | |
| 3 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 84 | 12.10% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 9 | 1.30% | |
| 5 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 5 | 0.72% | |
| 6 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 5 | 0.72% | |
| 7 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 8 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 9 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 10 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 11 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 13 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 14 | SURENDRA | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 694 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 417 | 59.74% | 1 | 16 | Strong |
| BSP | 163 | 23.35% | 2 | 14 | Weak |
| SP | 84 | 12.03% | 3 | 355 | Weak |
| IND | 10 | 1.43% | 4 | 212 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 1.29% | 5 | 155 | Poor |
| CPI | 5 | 0.72% | 6 | 191 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.29% | 7 | 94 | Poor |
| VSIP | 2 | 0.29% | 8 | 92 | Poor |
| SBU | 1 | 0.14% | 9 | 202 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.14% | 10 | 287 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.