P.S. SAIDPUR BHURUHI PS 241
RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS
SPSP187 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNA PASWAN (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 187 | 39.79% | |
| 2 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 180 | 38.30% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 49 | 10.43% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 17 | 3.62% | |
| 5 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 12 | 2.55% | |
| 6 | SURENDRA | IND | 8 | 1.70% | |
| 7 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 5 | 1.06% | |
| 8 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 4 | 0.85% | |
| 9 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 3 | 0.64% | |
| 10 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 11 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 12 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 13 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 14 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 470 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 187 | 39.12% | 1 | 190 | Average |
| BJP | 180 | 37.66% | 2 | 228 | Average |
| BSP | 49 | 10.25% | 3 | 188 | Weak |
| IND | 18 | 3.77% | 4 | 69 | Poor |
| INC | 17 | 3.56% | 5 | 40 | Poor |
| BSCP | 12 | 2.51% | 6 | 1 | Poor |
| CPI | 5 | 1.05% | 7 | 188 | Poor |
| SBU | 1 | 0.21% | 8 | 190 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.21% | 9 | 279 | Poor |
| VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 334 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.