P.S. GURSANDI PS 236
RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS
SPSP250 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNA PASWAN (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 250 | 39.94% | |
| 2 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 237 | 37.86% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 94 | 15.02% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 11 | 1.76% | |
| 5 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 8 | 1.28% | |
| 6 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 5 | 0.80% | |
| 7 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 8 | SURENDRA | IND | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 9 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 3 | 0.48% | |
| 10 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 3 | 0.48% | |
| 11 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 3 | 0.48% | |
| 12 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 13 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 14 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 1 | 0.16% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 626 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 250 | 39.49% | 1 | 101 | Average |
| BJP | 237 | 37.44% | 2 | 146 | Average |
| BSP | 94 | 14.85% | 3 | 69 | Weak |
| IND | 16 | 2.53% | 4 | 90 | Poor |
| INC | 11 | 1.74% | 5 | 112 | Poor |
| CPI | 8 | 1.26% | 6 | 87 | Poor |
| BSCP | 5 | 0.79% | 7 | 11 | Poor |
| VSIP | 3 | 0.47% | 8 | 54 | Poor |
| SBU | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 189 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 276 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.