P.S. BASAWA ROOM NO-3 PS 235
RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS
SPSP255 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNA PASWAN (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 255 | 38.17% | |
| 2 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 208 | 31.14% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 171 | 25.60% | |
| 4 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 8 | 1.20% | |
| 5 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 5 | 0.75% | |
| 6 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 4 | 0.60% | |
| 7 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 8 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 9 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 10 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 11 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 12 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 13 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 14 | SURENDRA | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 668 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 255 | 38.06% | 1 | 93 | Average |
| BJP | 208 | 31.04% | 2 | 182 | Average |
| BSP | 171 | 25.52% | 3 | 11 | Average |
| IND | 12 | 1.79% | 4 | 173 | Poor |
| CPI | 8 | 1.19% | 5 | 86 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.75% | 6 | 293 | Poor |
| VSIP | 3 | 0.45% | 7 | 53 | Poor |
| SBU | 2 | 0.30% | 9 | 104 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.30% | 10 | 181 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.30% | 8 | 92 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.