P.S. BARAICHA PS 232
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP185 votes at this polling station
over DASHARATH LAL (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 185 | 54.41% | |
| 2 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 64 | 18.82% | |
| 3 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 64 | 18.82% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 14 | 4.12% | |
| 5 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 4 | 1.18% | |
| 6 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 3 | 0.88% | |
| 7 | SURENDRA | IND | 2 | 0.59% | |
| 8 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 2 | 0.59% | |
| 9 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 10 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 11 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 340 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 185 | 54.09% | 1 | 220 | Strong |
| BSP | 64 | 18.71% | 2 | 133 | Weak |
| SP | 64 | 18.71% | 3 | 374 | Weak |
| INC | 14 | 4.09% | 4 | 70 | Poor |
| IND | 9 | 2.63% | 5 | 235 | Poor |
| SS | 3 | 0.88% | 6 | 106 | Poor |
| CPI | 1 | 0.29% | 7 | 380 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 325 | Poor |
| SBU | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 350 | Poor |
| VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 330 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.