P.S. SUDESHARA ROOM NO-2 PS 228
RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS
SPSP299 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNA PASWAN (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 299 | 58.86% | |
| 2 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 126 | 24.80% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 31 | 6.10% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 18 | 3.54% | |
| 5 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 12 | 2.36% | |
| 6 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 5 | 0.98% | |
| 7 | SURENDRA | IND | 5 | 0.98% | |
| 8 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 4 | 0.79% | |
| 9 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 10 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 11 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 12 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 13 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 508 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 299 | 58.40% | 1 | 53 | Strong |
| BJP | 126 | 24.61% | 2 | 304 | Weak |
| BSP | 31 | 6.05% | 3 | 251 | Poor |
| INC | 18 | 3.52% | 4 | 36 | Poor |
| IND | 14 | 2.73% | 5 | 126 | Poor |
| CPI | 12 | 2.34% | 6 | 22 | Poor |
| SS | 5 | 0.98% | 7 | 28 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.39% | 8 | 91 | Poor |
| VSIP | 1 | 0.20% | 9 | 184 | Poor |
| SBU | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 347 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.