P.S. TENDUWA ROOM NO-2 PS 220
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP371 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 371 | 63.64% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 160 | 27.44% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 26 | 4.46% | |
| 4 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 7 | 1.20% | |
| 5 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 4 | 0.69% | |
| 6 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 4 | 0.69% | |
| 7 | SURENDRA | IND | 4 | 0.69% | |
| 8 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 9 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 10 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 13 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 583 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 371 | 62.14% | 1 | 29 | Strong |
| SP | 160 | 26.80% | 2 | 236 | Average |
| BSP | 26 | 4.36% | 3 | 265 | Poor |
| IND | 12 | 2.01% | 4 | 171 | Poor |
| CPI | 7 | 1.17% | 5 | 118 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.67% | 6 | 320 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.34% | 7 | 178 | Poor |
| SBU | 1 | 0.17% | 8 | 186 | Poor |
| VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 325 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 316 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.