P.S. ALAMPUR GERIYA ROOM NO-2 PS 218
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP318 votes at this polling station
over DASHARATH LAL (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 318 | 55.89% | |
| 2 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 112 | 19.68% | |
| 3 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 89 | 15.64% | |
| 4 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 9 | 1.58% | |
| 5 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 9 | 1.58% | |
| 6 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 8 | 1.41% | |
| 7 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 6 | 1.05% | |
| 8 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 5 | 0.88% | |
| 9 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 4 | 0.70% | |
| 10 | SURENDRA | IND | 4 | 0.70% | |
| 11 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 12 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 13 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 14 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 569 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 318 | 55.11% | 1 | 61 | Strong |
| BSP | 112 | 19.41% | 2 | 51 | Weak |
| SP | 89 | 15.42% | 3 | 347 | Weak |
| IND | 24 | 4.16% | 4 | 31 | Poor |
| CPI | 9 | 1.56% | 5 | 66 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 1.56% | 6 | 152 | Poor |
| SBU | 5 | 0.87% | 7 | 33 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.35% | 8 | 177 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 177 | Poor |
| VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 324 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.