P.S. UMARA ROOM NO-2 PS 216
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP343 votes at this polling station
over DASHARATH LAL (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 343 | 53.34% | |
| 2 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 120 | 18.66% | |
| 3 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 108 | 16.80% | |
| 4 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 37 | 5.75% | |
| 5 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 8 | 1.24% | |
| 6 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 6 | 0.93% | |
| 7 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 6 | 0.93% | |
| 8 | SURENDRA | IND | 5 | 0.78% | |
| 9 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 4 | 0.62% | |
| 10 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 4 | 0.62% | |
| 11 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 12 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 643 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 343 | 53.18% | 1 | 47 | Strong |
| BSP | 120 | 18.60% | 2 | 40 | Weak |
| SP | 108 | 16.74% | 3 | 317 | Weak |
| SBU | 37 | 5.74% | 4 | 4 | Poor |
| IND | 17 | 2.64% | 5 | 79 | Poor |
| INC | 8 | 1.24% | 6 | 175 | Poor |
| SS | 6 | 0.93% | 7 | 19 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.62% | 8 | 247 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 313 | Poor |
| VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 323 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.