P.S. AKILPUR AIRANA ROOM NO-2 PS 212
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP287 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 287 | 69.66% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 62 | 15.05% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 29 | 7.04% | |
| 4 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 6 | 1.46% | |
| 5 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 6 | 1.46% | |
| 6 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 5 | 1.21% | |
| 7 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 5 | 1.21% | |
| 8 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 9 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 10 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 11 | SURENDRA | IND | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 12 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 13 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 14 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 1 | 0.24% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 412 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 287 | 68.50% | 1 | 88 | Strong |
| SP | 62 | 14.80% | 2 | 375 | Weak |
| BSP | 29 | 6.92% | 3 | 254 | Poor |
| IND | 13 | 3.10% | 4 | 145 | Poor |
| SBU | 6 | 1.43% | 6 | 22 | Poor |
| CPI | 6 | 1.43% | 5 | 148 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.19% | 7 | 291 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.48% | 8 | 90 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.24% | 9 | 270 | Poor |
| VSIP | 1 | 0.24% | 10 | 178 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.