P.S. KHAIRAI ROOM NO-3 PS 201
RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS
SPSP214 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNA PASWAN (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 214 | 53.77% | |
| 2 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 104 | 26.13% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 60 | 15.08% | |
| 4 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 5 | 1.26% | |
| 5 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 5 | 1.26% | |
| 6 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 4 | 1.01% | |
| 7 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 3 | 0.75% | |
| 8 | SURENDRA | IND | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 9 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 10 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 11 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 398 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 214 | 53.23% | 1 | 150 | Strong |
| BJP | 104 | 25.87% | 2 | 336 | Average |
| BSP | 60 | 14.93% | 3 | 143 | Weak |
| IND | 6 | 1.49% | 4 | 306 | Poor |
| CPI | 5 | 1.24% | 5 | 184 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.24% | 6 | 290 | Poor |
| SBU | 4 | 1.00% | 7 | 43 | Poor |
| SS | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 363 | Poor |
| VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 315 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 305 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.