U.P.S. HARDO ROOM NO-1 PS 20
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP318 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 318 | 62.48% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 129 | 25.34% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 37 | 7.27% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 10 | 1.96% | |
| 5 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 4 | 0.79% | |
| 6 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 7 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 8 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 9 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 10 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 11 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 12 | SURENDRA | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 509 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 318 | 62.35% | 1 | 60 | Strong |
| SP | 129 | 25.29% | 2 | 274 | Average |
| BSP | 37 | 7.25% | 3 | 229 | Poor |
| INC | 10 | 1.96% | 4 | 117 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 0.98% | 5 | 318 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.78% | 6 | 224 | Poor |
| BSCP | 3 | 0.59% | 7 | 29 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.39% | 8 | 131 | Poor |
| SBU | 1 | 0.20% | 9 | 136 | Poor |
| VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 239 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.