P.S. KHAIRAI ROOM NO-1 PS 199
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP330 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 330 | 60.44% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 140 | 25.64% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 25 | 4.58% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 13 | 2.38% | |
| 5 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 9 | 1.65% | |
| 6 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 8 | 1.47% | |
| 7 | SURENDRA | IND | 5 | 0.92% | |
| 8 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 4 | 0.73% | |
| 9 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 4 | 0.73% | |
| 10 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 11 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 12 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 13 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 14 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 1 | 0.18% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 546 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 330 | 59.35% | 1 | 53 | Strong |
| SP | 140 | 25.18% | 2 | 267 | Average |
| BSP | 25 | 4.50% | 3 | 273 | Poor |
| IND | 14 | 2.52% | 4 | 125 | Poor |
| INC | 13 | 2.34% | 5 | 84 | Poor |
| SBU | 9 | 1.62% | 6 | 12 | Poor |
| CPI | 8 | 1.44% | 7 | 84 | Poor |
| BSCP | 4 | 0.72% | 8 | 23 | Poor |
| VSIP | 2 | 0.36% | 9 | 86 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.18% | 10 | 265 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.