P.S. SADHUVAPUR PS 193
RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS
SPSP191 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNA PASWAN (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 191 | 54.73% | |
| 2 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 125 | 35.82% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 15 | 4.30% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 9 | 2.58% | |
| 5 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 7 | 2.01% | |
| 6 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 7 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 8 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | SURENDRA | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 349 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 191 | 54.57% | 1 | 184 | Strong |
| BJP | 125 | 35.71% | 2 | 305 | Average |
| BSP | 15 | 4.29% | 3 | 319 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 2.57% | 4 | 151 | Poor |
| CPI | 7 | 2.00% | 5 | 113 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.29% | 6 | 396 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.29% | 7 | 263 | Poor |
| SBU | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 334 | Poor |
| VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 311 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 300 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.