P.S. KISHUNPUR ROOM NO-3 PS 179
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP290 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 290 | 51.42% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 220 | 39.01% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 17 | 3.01% | |
| 4 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 10 | 1.77% | |
| 5 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 7 | 1.24% | |
| 6 | SURENDRA | IND | 5 | 0.89% | |
| 7 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 5 | 0.89% | |
| 8 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 3 | 0.53% | |
| 9 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 3 | 0.53% | |
| 10 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 11 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 12 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 13 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 564 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 290 | 51.06% | 1 | 83 | Strong |
| SP | 220 | 38.73% | 2 | 142 | Average |
| BSP | 17 | 2.99% | 3 | 311 | Poor |
| IND | 11 | 1.94% | 4 | 190 | Poor |
| VSIP | 10 | 1.76% | 5 | 14 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 1.23% | 6 | 208 | Poor |
| CPI | 5 | 0.88% | 7 | 181 | Poor |
| SS | 3 | 0.53% | 8 | 99 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.18% | 9 | 169 | Poor |
| SBU | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 327 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.