P.S. RAMPUR ROOM NO-2 PS 175
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP319 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 319 | 77.62% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 42 | 10.22% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 23 | 5.60% | |
| 4 | SURENDRA | IND | 8 | 1.95% | |
| 5 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 6 | 1.46% | |
| 6 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 4 | 0.97% | |
| 7 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 4 | 0.97% | |
| 8 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 3 | 0.73% | |
| 9 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 10 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 11 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 411 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 319 | 76.87% | 1 | 58 | Strong |
| SP | 42 | 10.12% | 2 | 398 | Weak |
| BSP | 23 | 5.54% | 3 | 283 | Poor |
| IND | 13 | 3.13% | 4 | 141 | Poor |
| BSCP | 6 | 1.45% | 5 | 6 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.96% | 6 | 241 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.72% | 7 | 348 | Poor |
| VSIP | 1 | 0.24% | 8 | 164 | Poor |
| SBU | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 323 | Poor |
| SS | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 358 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.