P.S. RAMPUR ROOM NO-1 PS 174
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP228 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 228 | 53.65% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 120 | 28.24% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 49 | 11.53% | |
| 4 | SURENDRA | IND | 7 | 1.65% | |
| 5 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 4 | 0.94% | |
| 6 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 3 | 0.71% | |
| 7 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 3 | 0.71% | |
| 8 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 3 | 0.71% | |
| 9 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 10 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 11 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 12 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 13 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 14 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 425 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 228 | 53.02% | 1 | 155 | Strong |
| SP | 120 | 27.91% | 2 | 293 | Average |
| BSP | 49 | 11.40% | 3 | 187 | Weak |
| IND | 13 | 3.02% | 4 | 140 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.93% | 5 | 316 | Poor |
| CPI | 3 | 0.70% | 7 | 286 | Poor |
| BSCP | 3 | 0.70% | 6 | 39 | Poor |
| SBU | 2 | 0.47% | 8 | 98 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.47% | 9 | 167 | Poor |
| VSIP | 1 | 0.23% | 10 | 163 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.