P.S. MAHAWATPUR ASAHAT ROOM NO-01 PS 172
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP373 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 373 | 55.26% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 137 | 20.30% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 91 | 13.48% | |
| 4 | SURENDRA | IND | 18 | 2.67% | |
| 5 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 14 | 2.07% | |
| 6 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 9 | 1.33% | |
| 7 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 8 | 1.19% | |
| 8 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 6 | 0.89% | |
| 9 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 5 | 0.74% | |
| 10 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 4 | 0.59% | |
| 11 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 4 | 0.59% | |
| 12 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 13 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 14 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 2 | 0.30% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 675 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 373 | 53.82% | 1 | 28 | Strong |
| SP | 137 | 19.77% | 2 | 271 | Weak |
| BSP | 91 | 13.13% | 3 | 75 | Weak |
| IND | 37 | 5.34% | 4 | 4 | Poor |
| CPI | 14 | 2.02% | 5 | 9 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 1.30% | 6 | 149 | Poor |
| SS | 6 | 0.87% | 7 | 18 | Poor |
| SBU | 4 | 0.58% | 8 | 40 | Poor |
| VSIP | 2 | 0.29% | 10 | 83 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.29% | 9 | 83 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.