P.S. BAHIYAPUR HEMLET OF RAIPUR BHASARAUL PS 164
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP280 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 280 | 59.57% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 91 | 19.36% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 61 | 12.98% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 14 | 2.98% | |
| 5 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 4 | 0.85% | |
| 6 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 4 | 0.85% | |
| 7 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 4 | 0.85% | |
| 8 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 3 | 0.64% | |
| 9 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.64% | |
| 10 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 11 | SURENDRA | IND | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 12 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 13 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 14 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 470 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 280 | 58.95% | 1 | 98 | Strong |
| SP | 91 | 19.16% | 2 | 344 | Weak |
| BSP | 61 | 12.84% | 3 | 140 | Weak |
| INC | 14 | 2.95% | 4 | 68 | Poor |
| IND | 11 | 2.32% | 5 | 189 | Poor |
| VSIP | 4 | 0.84% | 8 | 25 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.84% | 6 | 239 | Poor |
| SS | 4 | 0.84% | 7 | 55 | Poor |
| SBU | 1 | 0.21% | 9 | 174 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 287 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.