P.S. PAMBHIPUR PS 16
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP398 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 398 | 54.08% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 288 | 39.13% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 9 | 1.22% | |
| 4 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 7 | 0.95% | |
| 5 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 7 | 0.95% | |
| 6 | SURENDRA | IND | 6 | 0.82% | |
| 7 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 6 | 0.82% | |
| 8 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 5 | 0.68% | |
| 9 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 4 | 0.54% | |
| 10 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 11 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 12 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 13 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 14 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 736 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 398 | 53.64% | 1 | 20 | Strong |
| SP | 288 | 38.81% | 2 | 61 | Average |
| IND | 15 | 2.02% | 3 | 101 | Poor |
| BSP | 9 | 1.21% | 4 | 354 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 0.94% | 5 | 191 | Poor |
| SS | 7 | 0.94% | 6 | 8 | Poor |
| CPI | 5 | 0.67% | 7 | 164 | Poor |
| SBU | 4 | 0.54% | 8 | 37 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.27% | 9 | 61 | Poor |
| VSIP | 1 | 0.13% | 10 | 113 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.