P.S. LODHAURA PS 154
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP253 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 253 | 47.65% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 231 | 43.50% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 13 | 2.45% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 11 | 2.07% | |
| 5 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 8 | 1.51% | |
| 6 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 4 | 0.75% | |
| 7 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 4 | 0.75% | |
| 8 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 9 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 10 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 11 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 12 | SURENDRA | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 13 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 531 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 253 | 47.11% | 1 | 124 | Strong |
| SP | 231 | 43.02% | 2 | 125 | Strong |
| BSP | 13 | 2.42% | 3 | 329 | Poor |
| IND | 12 | 2.23% | 4 | 166 | Poor |
| INC | 11 | 2.05% | 5 | 110 | Poor |
| CPI | 8 | 1.49% | 6 | 80 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.37% | 7 | 80 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.19% | 8 | 253 | Poor |
| SBU | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 315 | Poor |
| VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 299 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.