P.S.LAUKIYAPUR ROOM NO-1 PS 14
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP272 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 272 | 46.34% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 213 | 36.29% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 57 | 9.71% | |
| 4 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 14 | 2.39% | |
| 5 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 5 | 0.85% | |
| 6 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 4 | 0.68% | |
| 7 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 4 | 0.68% | |
| 8 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 9 | SURENDRA | IND | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 10 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 11 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 12 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 13 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 14 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 2 | 0.34% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 587 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 272 | 45.71% | 1 | 104 | Strong |
| SP | 213 | 35.80% | 2 | 151 | Average |
| BSP | 57 | 9.58% | 3 | 153 | Poor |
| IND | 15 | 2.52% | 4 | 100 | Poor |
| CPI | 14 | 2.35% | 5 | 6 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.84% | 6 | 270 | Poor |
| SBU | 3 | 0.50% | 7 | 53 | Poor |
| SS | 3 | 0.50% | 8 | 77 | Poor |
| VSIP | 3 | 0.50% | 9 | 34 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.34% | 10 | 60 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.