P.S.KURA ROOM NO-3 PS 136
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP215 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 215 | 38.95% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 206 | 37.32% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 67 | 12.14% | |
| 4 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 23 | 4.17% | |
| 5 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 9 | 1.63% | |
| 6 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 9 | 1.63% | |
| 7 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 5 | 0.91% | |
| 8 | SURENDRA | IND | 4 | 0.72% | |
| 9 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 4 | 0.72% | |
| 10 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.54% | |
| 11 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 3 | 0.54% | |
| 12 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 13 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 14 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 1 | 0.18% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 552 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 215 | 38.67% | 1 | 176 | Average |
| SP | 206 | 37.05% | 2 | 165 | Average |
| BSP | 67 | 12.05% | 3 | 124 | Weak |
| CPI | 23 | 4.14% | 4 | 2 | Poor |
| IND | 17 | 3.06% | 5 | 78 | Poor |
| SBU | 9 | 1.62% | 7 | 11 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 1.62% | 6 | 146 | Poor |
| VSIP | 3 | 0.54% | 8 | 46 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.36% | 9 | 158 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.18% | 10 | 159 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.