P.S. CHAK BABULLAPUR BHABHUTI PS 133
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP300 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 300 | 52.26% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 155 | 27.00% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 72 | 12.54% | |
| 4 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 9 | 1.57% | |
| 5 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 8 | 1.39% | |
| 6 | SURENDRA | IND | 7 | 1.22% | |
| 7 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 7 | 1.22% | |
| 8 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 4 | 0.70% | |
| 9 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 4 | 0.70% | |
| 10 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 3 | 0.52% | |
| 11 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 12 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 13 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 14 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 1 | 0.17% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 574 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 300 | 51.55% | 1 | 75 | Strong |
| SP | 155 | 26.63% | 2 | 248 | Average |
| BSP | 72 | 12.37% | 3 | 113 | Weak |
| IND | 24 | 4.12% | 4 | 28 | Poor |
| CPI | 9 | 1.55% | 5 | 59 | Poor |
| INC | 8 | 1.37% | 6 | 170 | Poor |
| SS | 3 | 0.52% | 7 | 93 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.17% | 8 | 157 | Poor |
| SBU | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 165 | Poor |
| VSIP | 1 | 0.17% | 10 | 149 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.