P.S. SHAHJAHANPUR SELRHA ROOM NO-1 PS 127
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP239 votes at this polling station
over DASHARATH LAL (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 239 | 48.68% | |
| 2 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 113 | 23.01% | |
| 3 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 91 | 18.53% | |
| 4 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 10 | 2.04% | |
| 5 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 9 | 1.83% | |
| 6 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 9 | 1.83% | |
| 7 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 5 | 1.02% | |
| 8 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 5 | 1.02% | |
| 9 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 3 | 0.61% | |
| 10 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 3 | 0.61% | |
| 11 | SURENDRA | IND | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 12 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 13 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 491 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 239 | 47.99% | 1 | 140 | Strong |
| BSP | 113 | 22.69% | 2 | 50 | Weak |
| SP | 91 | 18.27% | 3 | 342 | Weak |
| IND | 18 | 3.61% | 4 | 67 | Poor |
| CPI | 10 | 2.01% | 5 | 42 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 1.81% | 6 | 143 | Poor |
| SS | 5 | 1.00% | 7 | 24 | Poor |
| SBU | 3 | 0.60% | 8 | 64 | Poor |
| VSIP | 3 | 0.60% | 9 | 45 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 272 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.