U.P.S. DHARMNGADPUR NARVA PS 118
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP235 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 235 | 46.44% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 101 | 19.96% | |
| 3 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 85 | 16.80% | |
| 4 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 14 | 2.77% | |
| 5 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 13 | 2.57% | |
| 6 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 13 | 2.57% | |
| 7 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 10 | 1.98% | |
| 8 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 9 | 1.78% | |
| 9 | SURENDRA | IND | 7 | 1.38% | |
| 10 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 6 | 1.19% | |
| 11 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 5 | 0.99% | |
| 12 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 5 | 0.99% | |
| 13 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 14 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 1 | 0.20% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 506 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 235 | 45.45% | 1 | 149 | Strong |
| SP | 101 | 19.54% | 2 | 333 | Weak |
| SBU | 85 | 16.44% | 3 | 2 | Weak |
| IND | 36 | 6.96% | 4 | 6 | Poor |
| BSP | 14 | 2.71% | 5 | 322 | Poor |
| CPI | 13 | 2.51% | 6 | 15 | Poor |
| INC | 13 | 2.51% | 7 | 80 | Poor |
| VSIP | 6 | 1.16% | 8 | 18 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.39% | 9 | 155 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.19% | 10 | 152 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.