P.S. PERI PS 115
RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS
SPSP418 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNA PASWAN (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 418 | 65.31% | |
| 2 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 167 | 26.09% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 19 | 2.97% | |
| 4 | SURENDRA | IND | 10 | 1.56% | |
| 5 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 6 | 0.94% | |
| 6 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 5 | 0.78% | |
| 7 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 4 | 0.62% | |
| 8 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 9 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 10 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 11 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 12 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 13 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 640 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 418 | 63.91% | 1 | 10 | Strong |
| BJP | 167 | 25.54% | 2 | 248 | Average |
| BSP | 19 | 2.91% | 3 | 300 | Poor |
| IND | 15 | 2.29% | 4 | 106 | Poor |
| CPI | 6 | 0.92% | 5 | 140 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.76% | 6 | 281 | Poor |
| SS | 4 | 0.61% | 7 | 51 | Poor |
| BSCP | 3 | 0.46% | 8 | 36 | Poor |
| VSIP | 2 | 0.31% | 9 | 79 | Poor |
| SBU | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 157 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.