P.S. MAJHTENI ROOM NO-1 PS 113
RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS
SPSP325 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNA PASWAN (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 325 | 58.04% | |
| 2 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 147 | 26.25% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 49 | 8.75% | |
| 4 | SURENDRA | IND | 13 | 2.32% | |
| 5 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 8 | 1.43% | |
| 6 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 4 | 0.71% | |
| 7 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 4 | 0.71% | |
| 8 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 9 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 10 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 11 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 12 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 13 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 14 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 560 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 325 | 55.37% | 1 | 35 | Strong |
| BJP | 147 | 25.04% | 2 | 277 | Average |
| BSP | 49 | 8.35% | 3 | 185 | Poor |
| IND | 21 | 3.58% | 4 | 39 | Poor |
| CPI | 8 | 1.36% | 5 | 77 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.68% | 6 | 313 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.34% | 7 | 71 | Poor |
| VSIP | 2 | 0.34% | 9 | 78 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.34% | 8 | 154 | Poor |
| SBU | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 299 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.