U.P.S. TENI ROOM NO-2 PS 112
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP358 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 358 | 65.81% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 143 | 26.29% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 10 | 1.84% | |
| 4 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 7 | 1.29% | |
| 5 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 5 | 0.92% | |
| 6 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 5 | 0.92% | |
| 7 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 8 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 9 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 10 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 11 | SURENDRA | IND | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 12 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 13 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 14 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 1 | 0.18% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 544 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 358 | 64.62% | 1 | 39 | Strong |
| SP | 143 | 25.81% | 2 | 261 | Average |
| IND | 15 | 2.71% | 3 | 105 | Poor |
| BSP | 10 | 1.81% | 4 | 347 | Poor |
| CPI | 7 | 1.26% | 5 | 103 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.90% | 6 | 279 | Poor |
| BSCP | 3 | 0.54% | 7 | 35 | Poor |
| SBU | 1 | 0.18% | 8 | 155 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.18% | 9 | 241 | Poor |
| VSIP | 1 | 0.18% | 10 | 142 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.