U.P.S. BAHLOLPUR AILAI ROOM NO-3 PS 103
KRISHNA PASWAN
BJPBJP348 votes at this polling station
over RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNA PASWAN | BJP | 348 | 59.18% | |
| 2 | RAMTHIRTH PARAMHANS | SP | 117 | 19.90% | |
| 3 | DASHARATH LAL | BSP | 48 | 8.16% | |
| 4 | ARVIND KUMAR | SBU | 29 | 4.93% | |
| 5 | OMPRAKASH GIHAR | INC | 16 | 2.72% | |
| 6 | RAM KRISHNA HEGDE | CPI | 9 | 1.53% | |
| 7 | SURENDRA | IND | 7 | 1.19% | |
| 8 | AJAY KUMAR | SS | 6 | 1.02% | |
| 9 | RAM BARAN GAUTAM | IND | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 10 | VIJAY KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 11 | MAIKOO LAL | IND | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 12 | AJAY CHAODHARY | BSCP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 13 | KESHAN LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | NILAM SONI | VSIP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 588 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 348 | 58.39% | 1 | 43 | Strong |
| SP | 117 | 19.63% | 2 | 300 | Weak |
| BSP | 48 | 8.05% | 3 | 191 | Poor |
| SBU | 29 | 4.87% | 4 | 5 | Poor |
| INC | 16 | 2.68% | 5 | 48 | Poor |
| IND | 14 | 2.35% | 6 | 123 | Poor |
| CPI | 9 | 1.51% | 7 | 56 | Poor |
| SS | 6 | 1.01% | 8 | 15 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 148 | Poor |
| VSIP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 276 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 243, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.