SARSWATI SHISU MANDIR CHAUK FATEHPUR ROOM-4 PS 75

AC 240 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

Chandra Prakash

SPSP

558 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

517 82.7 pp

votes

over Vikram Singh (BJP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors1,005

Total turnout625votes cast at this station

Turnout %62.2% of this booth's roll

Male electors329

Female electors296

Vote share in this booth

of 625 votes counted

SP 89.3% BJP 6.6% BSP 2.9% INC 0.6% JAP 0.3% AZAD 0.2% IND 0.2%

Candidates at this booth

11 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	Chandra Prakash	SP	558	89.28%
2	Vikram Singh	BJP	41	6.56%
3	Ayuv Ahmad Alias Ayyub Ahmad	BSP	18	2.88%
4	Mohsin Ahmad Alias Mohsin Khan	INC	4	0.64%
5	Bhola Singh	JAP	2	0.32%
6	Vimal Kumar	AZAD	1	0.16%
7	Kuldeep Singh	IND	1	0.16%
8	Ratna Singh	BSCP	0	0.00%
9	Avinash Rao	PD	0	0.00%
10	Phool Singh Lodhi	BMP	0	0.00%
11	Brijbhaan Alias Brijbhaan Prajapati	AAP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 625 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

11 parties · AC 240

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
SP	558	89.28%	1	3	Strong
BJP	41	6.56%	2	387	Poor
BSP	18	2.88%	3	283	Poor
INC	4	0.64%	4	179	Poor
JAP	2	0.32%	5	56	Poor
IND	1	0.16%	7	259	Poor
AZAD	1	0.16%	6	200	Poor
AAP	0	0.00%	8	240	Poor
BMP	0	0.00%	9	223	Poor
BSCP	0	0.00%	10	275	Poor
PD	0	0.00%	11	352	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 240, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.