KARYALAY KHDAY AVAM VIPARAN PIRANPUR FATEHPUR ROOM-1 PS 150
Vikram Singh
BJPBJP207 votes at this polling station
over Chandra Prakash (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vikram Singh | BJP | 207 | 52.27% | |
| 2 | Chandra Prakash | SP | 173 | 43.69% | |
| 3 | Ayuv Ahmad Alias Ayyub Ahmad | BSP | 6 | 1.52% | |
| 4 | Mohsin Ahmad Alias Mohsin Khan | INC | 5 | 1.26% | |
| 5 | Vimal Kumar | AZAD | 2 | 0.51% | |
| 6 | Avinash Rao | PD | 2 | 0.51% | |
| 7 | Ratna Singh | BSCP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 8 | Kuldeep Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Brijbhaan Alias Brijbhaan Prajapati | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Bhola Singh | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Phool Singh Lodhi | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 396 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 207 | 52.01% | 1 | 207 | Strong |
| SP | 173 | 43.47% | 2 | 270 | Strong |
| BSP | 6 | 1.51% | 3 | 366 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.26% | 4 | 134 | Poor |
| PD | 2 | 0.50% | 6 | 219 | Poor |
| AZAD | 2 | 0.50% | 5 | 116 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.25% | 7 | 167 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 286 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 288 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 369 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 309 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 240, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.