P.S.ITARA PS 358
MADAN GOPAL
SPSP266 votes at this polling station
over ADITYA PANDEY (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MADAN GOPAL | SP | 266 | 51.95% | |
| 2 | ADITYA PANDEY | BSP | 182 | 35.55% | |
| 3 | RAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | BJP | 50 | 9.77% | |
| 4 | KAMLA DEVI | INC | 5 | 0.98% | |
| 5 | VINIT KUMAR | AAP | 5 | 0.98% | |
| 6 | SANTOSH SAHNI | VIP | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 7 | VIKAS PAL | RUP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 8 | RAMGOPAL UTTAM | AAD | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 9 | ANOOP SACHAN | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | AMAR SINGH | BVP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | BRIJENDRA KUMAR | BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RAM SARAN SAHU | SJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | RAM KHELAVAN | ASP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 512 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 266 | 51.85% | 1 | 47 | Strong |
| BSP | 182 | 35.48% | 2 | 40 | Average |
| BJP | 50 | 9.75% | 3 | 365 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 0.97% | 4 | 27 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.97% | 5 | 209 | Poor |
| VIP | 2 | 0.39% | 6 | 147 | Poor |
| RUP | 1 | 0.19% | 8 | 298 | Poor |
| AAD | 1 | 0.19% | 7 | 282 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 374 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 380 | Poor |
| BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 367 | Poor |
| BVP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 376 | Poor |
| SJP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 365 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 238, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.