P.S. PANDEYPUR PS 302
MADAN GOPAL
SPSP372 votes at this polling station
over ADITYA PANDEY (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MADAN GOPAL | SP | 372 | 63.37% | |
| 2 | ADITYA PANDEY | BSP | 104 | 17.72% | |
| 3 | RAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | BJP | 95 | 16.18% | |
| 4 | KAMLA DEVI | INC | 4 | 0.68% | |
| 5 | VINIT KUMAR | AAP | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 6 | SANTOSH SAHNI | VIP | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 7 | RAMGOPAL UTTAM | AAD | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 8 | ANOOP SACHAN | JAP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 9 | RAM SARAN SAHU | SJP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 10 | RAM KHELAVAN | ASP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | AMAR SINGH | BVP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | BRIJENDRA KUMAR | BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | VIKAS PAL | RUP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 587 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 372 | 63.27% | 1 | 11 | Strong |
| BSP | 104 | 17.69% | 2 | 162 | Weak |
| BJP | 95 | 16.16% | 3 | 320 | Weak |
| INC | 4 | 0.68% | 4 | 237 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.51% | 5 | 86 | Poor |
| VIP | 3 | 0.51% | 6 | 76 | Poor |
| AAD | 2 | 0.34% | 7 | 164 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.34% | 8 | 280 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 235 | Poor |
| SJP | 1 | 0.17% | 10 | 171 | Poor |
| RUP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 367 | Poor |
| BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 334 | Poor |
| BVP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 349 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 238, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.