P.S. MADRI ROOM-2 PS 261
ADITYA PANDEY
BSPBSP235 votes at this polling station
over MADAN GOPAL (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ADITYA PANDEY | BSP | 235 | 45.54% | |
| 2 | MADAN GOPAL | SP | 139 | 26.94% | |
| 3 | RAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | BJP | 86 | 16.67% | |
| 4 | ANOOP SACHAN | JAP | 14 | 2.71% | |
| 5 | RAM SARAN SAHU | SJP | 8 | 1.55% | |
| 6 | KAMLA DEVI | INC | 6 | 1.16% | |
| 7 | AMAR SINGH | BVP | 5 | 0.97% | |
| 8 | VINIT KUMAR | AAP | 5 | 0.97% | |
| 9 | SANTOSH SAHNI | VIP | 4 | 0.78% | |
| 10 | RAMGOPAL UTTAM | AAD | 4 | 0.78% | |
| 11 | BRIJENDRA KUMAR | BSSP | 4 | 0.78% | |
| 12 | RAM KHELAVAN | ASP | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 13 | VIKAS PAL | RUP | 3 | 0.58% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 516 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 235 | 44.93% | 1 | 10 | Strong |
| SP | 139 | 26.58% | 2 | 202 | Average |
| BJP | 86 | 16.44% | 3 | 335 | Weak |
| JAP | 14 | 2.68% | 4 | 28 | Poor |
| SJP | 8 | 1.53% | 5 | 2 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 1.15% | 6 | 173 | Poor |
| BVP | 5 | 0.96% | 8 | 13 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 0.96% | 7 | 22 | Poor |
| AAD | 4 | 0.76% | 9 | 40 | Poor |
| BSSP | 4 | 0.76% | 10 | 6 | Poor |
| VIP | 4 | 0.76% | 11 | 43 | Poor |
| RUP | 3 | 0.57% | 13 | 144 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.57% | 12 | 71 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 238, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.