P.S.JARA PS 224
RAJENDRA SINGH PATEL
BJPBJP271 votes at this polling station
over MADAN GOPAL (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | BJP | 271 | 52.83% | |
| 2 | MADAN GOPAL | SP | 118 | 23.00% | |
| 3 | ADITYA PANDEY | BSP | 98 | 19.10% | |
| 4 | RAMGOPAL UTTAM | AAD | 5 | 0.97% | |
| 5 | ANOOP SACHAN | JAP | 4 | 0.78% | |
| 6 | KAMLA DEVI | INC | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 7 | VIKAS PAL | RUP | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 8 | VINIT KUMAR | AAP | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 9 | RAM KHELAVAN | ASP | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 10 | AMAR SINGH | BVP | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 11 | BRIJENDRA KUMAR | BSSP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 12 | RAM SARAN SAHU | SJP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 13 | SANTOSH SAHNI | VIP | 1 | 0.19% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 513 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 271 | 52.62% | 1 | 104 | Strong |
| SP | 118 | 22.91% | 2 | 232 | Weak |
| BSP | 98 | 19.03% | 3 | 178 | Weak |
| AAD | 5 | 0.97% | 4 | 20 | Poor |
| JAP | 4 | 0.78% | 5 | 173 | Poor |
| RUP | 3 | 0.58% | 9 | 137 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.58% | 8 | 277 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.58% | 6 | 71 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.58% | 7 | 66 | Poor |
| BVP | 2 | 0.39% | 10 | 82 | Poor |
| SJP | 1 | 0.19% | 12 | 143 | Poor |
| BSSP | 1 | 0.19% | 11 | 106 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.19% | 13 | 224 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 238, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.