P.S. SAGUNAPUR PS 12
MADAN GOPAL
SPSP223 votes at this polling station
over RAJENDRA SINGH PATEL (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MADAN GOPAL | SP | 223 | 67.78% | |
| 2 | RAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | BJP | 72 | 21.88% | |
| 3 | ADITYA PANDEY | BSP | 17 | 5.17% | |
| 4 | VINIT KUMAR | AAP | 5 | 1.52% | |
| 5 | SANTOSH SAHNI | VIP | 3 | 0.91% | |
| 6 | KAMLA DEVI | INC | 3 | 0.91% | |
| 7 | RAM KHELAVAN | ASP | 2 | 0.61% | |
| 8 | VIKAS PAL | RUP | 2 | 0.61% | |
| 9 | RAM SARAN SAHU | SJP | 1 | 0.30% | |
| 10 | AMAR SINGH | BVP | 1 | 0.30% | |
| 11 | BRIJENDRA KUMAR | BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RAMGOPAL UTTAM | AAD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | ANOOP SACHAN | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 329 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 223 | 67.17% | 1 | 80 | Strong |
| BJP | 72 | 21.69% | 2 | 347 | Weak |
| BSP | 17 | 5.12% | 3 | 373 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 1.51% | 4 | 8 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.90% | 5 | 252 | Poor |
| VIP | 3 | 0.90% | 6 | 51 | Poor |
| RUP | 2 | 0.60% | 8 | 160 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.60% | 7 | 89 | Poor |
| BVP | 1 | 0.30% | 9 | 103 | Poor |
| SJP | 1 | 0.30% | 10 | 70 | Poor |
| AAD | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 295 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 349 | Poor |
| BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 154 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 238, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.