PR. VI. GAURIKHANPUR MAJRA HARDAULI ROOM N0 1 PS 99
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP354 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 354 | 53.23% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 174 | 26.17% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 110 | 16.54% | |
| 4 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 11 | 1.65% | |
| 5 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 8 | 1.20% | |
| 6 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 4 | 0.60% | |
| 7 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 8 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 9 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 10 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 665 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 354 | 52.37% | 1 | 41 | Strong |
| BJP | 174 | 25.74% | 2 | 211 | Average |
| BSP | 110 | 16.27% | 3 | 147 | Weak |
| AK | 11 | 1.63% | 4 | 30 | Poor |
| INC | 8 | 1.18% | 5 | 65 | Poor |
| JAP | 4 | 0.59% | 6 | 183 | Poor |
| BSWP | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 172 | Poor |
| CPI | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 322 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.15% | 7 | 182 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.15% | 8 | 236 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 326 | Poor |
| RVP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 312 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.